Report thrusts the prominent energy institute into a critical part of the debate over the Keystone XL—whether the pipeline would worsen global warming.
By John H. Cushman Jr.
Growth in the Canadian oil sands industry will depend on the construction of major new pipelines, including the disputed Keystone XL across the United States, according to a report by a prominent energy institute.
The faster new pipelines are approved, the more rapid the increase in tar sands production over the next two decades, the International Energy Agency said in its annual World Energy Outlook, released on Nov. 12. Accelerated growth would mean a surge in global greenhouse gas emissions, which the IEA has said are already on a "dangerous" course.
The finding thrusts the IEA into a critical part of the debate over the proposed Keystone XL—whether the project would worsen global warming. The IEA’s conclusion contrasts with what the U.S. State Department said in its high-profile draft environmental impact study.
According to the State Department, tar sands production would increase with or without the Keystone XL, and therefore the pipeline wouldn’t exacerbate the problem of carbon pollution. The question is important because Obama has said his decision will hinge on the "net effects of the pipeline’s impact on our climate."
Canadian Gov’t Emissions Report Undermines Keystone Pipeline Pitch
Scientists: Key Parts of State Dept Keystone Review Are ‘Without Merit’
Keystone Report Skirts Climate Analysis Required Under Law, Lawyers Say
Climate Talks in Poland Will Open Amid Flurry of New Scientific Warnings
Sent by gReader Pro