Analysis of 1,000 public comments shows that authors of more than half of them have ties to various companies that may benefit from pipeline’s approval.
By Lisa Song
Environmentalists who spent a month analyzing public comments on the Keystone XL linked more than half the pro-pipeline comments they examined to people in the oil industry. As the U.S. State Department considers whether to approve the project, the activists want those remarks to carry less weight than those written by people without a vested interest in the outcome.
Out of a random sample of more than 1,000 comments in support of the Keystone, the environmentalists connected about 60 percent of the commenters’ names to oil and pipeline company employees, investors, lobbyists, attorneys and others working for the industry—all of whom could potentially benefit from the construction of the pipeline, the activists said. If built, the pipeline would carry diluted bitumen from Canada’s tar sands region to the Texas Gulf Coast.
"We don’t want to accuse anyone of wrongdoing … but to me this raises a red flag," said Terra Friedrichs, a volunteer at the environmental group 350MA who led the analysis. 350MA is a Massachusetts grassroots organization that advocates for sustainable energy. It often collaborates with, but is not affiliated with the national group 350.org.
Regulations.gov, the website used to collect public comments, doesn’t require people to disclose their names, nationalities, occupations or financial interests.
Critical Part of Keystone Report Done by Firms with Deep Oil Industry Ties
Sent by gReader Pro